| Films that should never have sequels | |
|
+7dididave atticusuk berlioz Sam_Garland steerpyke Angus lisa2062 11 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
lisa2062
Number of posts : 2129 Age : 41 Location : Dorset Registration date : 2006-03-17
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Sat 01 Jul 2006, 21:39 | |
| I didn't realise they were doing more! I actually liked the first 2 films, but don't know how I'd feel about seeing more. Lisa x | |
|
| |
butters
Number of posts : 975 Age : 33 Location : 3 miles to the left of the universe Registration date : 2006-03-26
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Sat 01 Jul 2006, 22:05 | |
| See-shrek 3 and 4 is coming out and a spin-off. That is overdoing it completely and i would prefer different ideas (shrek 3 2007 btw i think). I liked the first 2 but the 1st was better because of the fairy tale parodies (i studied it so know them all)-whiich made it so funny-they have used up the best ones in my opninion and the 1st was best so far | |
|
| |
Sam_Garland
Number of posts : 769 Age : 36 Registration date : 2006-06-24
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Sat 01 Jul 2006, 22:16 | |
| Yeah, there's a Sin City 2 and a Fantastic Four 2 coming out soon... where's all the new ideas?!?
p.s... my 100th post! What a landmark... | |
|
| |
steerpyke
Number of posts : 1099 Age : 58 Location : The Kingdom of Wessex Registration date : 2006-03-05
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Sat 01 Jul 2006, 22:57 | |
| - Sam_Garland wrote:
- Yeah, there's a Sin City 2
Havent even seen the first one yet, but its on in about an hour. | |
|
| |
butters
Number of posts : 975 Age : 33 Location : 3 miles to the left of the universe Registration date : 2006-03-26
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Sun 02 Jul 2006, 01:11 | |
| I fear Pirates of the Caribbean will bedone to death. 1st was superb, the 2nd looks it but a 3rd? Hopefully they'll maintain quality. | |
|
| |
Louise90
Number of posts : 411 Location : Norfolk, England Registration date : 2006-02-13
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Sun 02 Jul 2006, 16:56 | |
| I don't think they should've done 'Grease 2' or 'Dirty Dancing' again. They never seem as good as the first time round, do they?! | |
|
| |
lisa2062
Number of posts : 2129 Age : 41 Location : Dorset Registration date : 2006-03-17
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Sun 02 Jul 2006, 18:19 | |
| I actually liked those sequels, but again that could have something to do with the cute guys in them! Lisa x | |
|
| |
butters
Number of posts : 975 Age : 33 Location : 3 miles to the left of the universe Registration date : 2006-03-26
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Sun 02 Jul 2006, 23:13 | |
| Mask-Son of the Mask. Another one that spoilt a great film | |
|
| |
spoilt_little_brat
Number of posts : 1427 Age : 38 Location : Conisbrough nr Doncaster Registration date : 2006-02-28
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Sun 02 Jul 2006, 23:14 | |
| Im looking 4ward to sin city 2, shrek!!!! | |
|
| |
butters
Number of posts : 975 Age : 33 Location : 3 miles to the left of the universe Registration date : 2006-03-26
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Sun 02 Jul 2006, 23:18 | |
| Shrek i am but i think a fourth shouldn't be made. Iwant to see Sin City 1 first though. Pirates of the Caribbean 2 released in one week now. | |
|
| |
steerpyke
Number of posts : 1099 Age : 58 Location : The Kingdom of Wessex Registration date : 2006-03-05
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Tue 04 Jul 2006, 14:38 | |
| after watching Sin City I cant wait for the follow up.
Also saw Alien Ressurection last night, nothing special but better that the third film. They should have ended on a high after the second film as the first two films are awesome. | |
|
| |
Sam_Garland
Number of posts : 769 Age : 36 Registration date : 2006-06-24
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels Tue 04 Jul 2006, 14:47 | |
| Yeah, the first two Alien films were great. The second Alien was the best of the two in my opinion! | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Films that should never have sequels | |
| |
|
| |
| Films that should never have sequels | |
|