Multiple Accounts.

Anyone else wondering why there has been a slew of multiple account shennenagins going on at the moment as well as a few copists. It makes me laugh when someone writes three poor paragraphs and gets a load of SU's and thinks we wont notice the same three names doling out VU's.

Similarly with the copies when you get one introductory paragraph along the lines of " i think dis is a gr8 film, you should by it or wot?" and the rest of the review reads with the literary eloquence of Oscar Wilde your suspiscions are somewhat aroused"

will they ever learn...the swines.

I always thought you had multiple accounts as I could never work out who would give you a VU.

Quote :

i think dis is a gr8 film, you should by it or wot?"

I fought dat was Oscar Wilde

The problem is all the graduate students are so used to copying their assignments from the internet they have forgotten what it is like to write some original work therefore they copy reviews as well.

The best duplicate account was the person who admitted they set up a duplicate account just to write a review on something they did not want to put their normal user name to , they have now deleted the review after I pointed out that they could have both accounts deleted.

Thought that was you !

I have a different account for each of the seventeen multiple personalities that live in my head, except Barnabus...he wants nothing to do with it....what?...I know thats what I said....shut up im talking....god they are all awake now....

steerpyke wrote:

god they are all awake now....

Just us then.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Thingywhatsit wrote:

Quote :

i think dis is a gr8 film, you should by it or wot?"

I fought dat was Oscar Wilde

dat waz.

Sam_Garland wrote:

Thingywhatsit wrote:

Quote :

i think dis is a gr8 film, you should by it or wot?"

I fought dat was Oscar Wilde

dat waz.

Really? Sounds more like Strindberg.

Thingywhatsit wrote:

Quote :

i think dis is a gr8 film, you should by it or wot?"

I fought dat was Oscar Wilde

No Wilde said "the only think worse than having your reviews copied, is not having your reviews copied"


he did talk crap sometimes....

Thingywhatsit wrote:

Thought that was you !

No all my multiple accounts have guide status now so I have no need to create any more and my ever expanding soap and candles empire along with my band performances means I have little time to do much else.

Now I'm worried. I thought I had multiple personalities but it turns out that I may be just a figment of someone elses psychosis. O well if thats the case you can pay my council tax...

Barnabus says no.

Just out of curiosity Dave, is your foodbill higher since you have seventeen people to feed?

I make them eat out.

Am I going on holiday as a loved up rocket with ANOTHER MEMBER in his Dooyoo bus or am I stacking cabbages and throwing apples at the french?

SORRY ANGUS, NO NAMES.

Depends... what would be more fun?

And just when you think its safe to venture out into dooyooland theres another swine at it, this time churning stuff in the guarded halls of my very own beloved music catergory. Still it keeps google in work. Why oh why oh why oh why.....the blighters...repeat until despair.

Churners have been really rife this last week. There is one girl who has written in excess of 50 reviews and only read 6 reviews. This is all in the space of about a week or so!

Summer holidyas, always the same.

WendyBull wrote:

Churners have been really rife this last week. There is one girl who has written in excess of 50 reviews and only read 6 reviews. This is all in the space of about a week or so!

And yet for some reason or other that I fail to comprehend people still read thier reviews, why do people do that? Are readers too stupid to realise they dont read back, dont care or just want to read everything. I dont read anyone who doesnt read back (and i dont mean mine just doesnt read back in general. I have no idea who reads mine unless they comment) and i normally remember to avoid reading those who write complete crap even if they do read back.

i often wonder why people keep reading those who post loads of ops in a row and dont read back!

Because people are sheep and are afraid they may miss that read back if ever it comes.

Actually mostly I think it's by accident. In my case anyway. I tend to read from different areas and quite often click on one before I realise it is a churner.

Na I think I go along with Angus, people are so desperate for that 3p that they read their reviews anyway in case they suddenly decide to start reading and in the case of the writers who continually write rubbish for 100 reviews or so that is most certainly the case. The 3p matters more than the fact theat the review is rubbish and of no use to anyone like every other one they will have written

There are a few people who have been churning of late whose usernames I do remember, but whose reviews I keep clicking on by mistake. I can give them a SU or a NU if it's really useless, but I can't take that 3p back!

There have been a few truly awful 'non-opinions' lately - really does drag the site down.