| Why I was banned | |
|
+6Ailran koshkha WendyBull Thingywhatsit spoilt_little_brat brax 10 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
brax
Number of posts : 18 Registration date : 2006-12-11
| Subject: Why I was banned Mon 11 Dec 2006, 15:11 | |
| Dear Brax,
I am sorry to say that your account has been frozen. During a recent sweep for fraud, we found several instances of rapid "clicking through" of opinions. While reading very quickly is impressive, this bordered on the fantastic. We're currently looking into this in more detail, but we did want you to know why your account had to be blocked yet again.
Best regards,
Your dooyooTeam
-- Anne Bursch
dooyoo.co.uk Ltd. PO Box 52003 London SW2 4ZW | |
|
| |
brax
Number of posts : 18 Registration date : 2006-12-11
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Mon 11 Dec 2006, 15:14 | |
| I had 270 reads (I think) and rated less than 100 people. Gulit made me click to make up the number. It was random clicking to redress the balance | |
|
| |
spoilt_little_brat
Number of posts : 1427 Age : 38 Location : Conisbrough nr Doncaster Registration date : 2006-02-28
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Mon 11 Dec 2006, 15:17 | |
| I dont think it is so much the number you read that they are picking up on but more the fact that each review seemed to be 'read' so fast that they think you didn't read the reviews, just rated. | |
|
| |
Thingywhatsit Admin
Number of posts : 5842 Age : 72 Registration date : 2006-02-12
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Mon 11 Dec 2006, 15:30 | |
| I think they thought you were speedreading. There is a difference between clicking as I said and actually reading, and people that write reviews deserve a read rather than a click, even if it is a 3 pence click. That really is not what the site is about. | |
|
| |
WendyBull
Number of posts : 2028 Age : 52 Registration date : 2006-04-04
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Mon 11 Dec 2006, 15:38 | |
| I think you asre confused Brax. If you rate lots of reviews in the space of a few minutes you are obviously not reading them and that is why dooyoo have suspended you. If you want to redress the balance on your account (if you get re-instated) then you should be reading the reviews that you want too and then rating them not just opening them and rating. | |
|
| |
koshkha
Number of posts : 1091 Age : 59 Location : Northants & S. Cheshire - depends on the day of the week Registration date : 2006-08-17
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Tue 12 Dec 2006, 18:31 | |
| 'Yet again' Does this mean it's not the first time you've been blocked? | |
|
| |
Ailran
Number of posts : 355 Location : Bedford, 'central to Oxford/Cambridge corridor' Registration date : 2006-02-28
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Sun 17 Dec 2006, 19:07 | |
| - brax wrote:
- I had 270 reads (I think) and rated less than 100 people. Gulit made me click to make up the number. It was random clicking to redress the balance
I think you have answered your own question here as this reads like you just clicked on loads of reviews to make your read number go up a lot. If that was the case then they can no doubt tell this going by their lettr to you. | |
|
| |
steerpyke
Number of posts : 1099 Age : 59 Location : The Kingdom of Wessex Registration date : 2006-03-05
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Mon 18 Dec 2006, 16:37 | |
| - brax wrote:
- Gulit made me click to make up the number. It was random clicking to redress the balance
Gulit...as in Ruud Gulit? Its a sign of the times when former international football stars are forcing writers to endulge in "clicking cartel" operations. What is the world coming to. Next it will be Kevin Keegan posting copies of other peoples work and Eric Cantona revenge rating. Where will it end. | |
|
| |
koshkha
Number of posts : 1091 Age : 59 Location : Northants & S. Cheshire - depends on the day of the week Registration date : 2006-08-17
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Tue 19 Dec 2006, 12:33 | |
| - brax wrote:
- I had 270 reads (I think) and rated less than 100 people. Gulit made me click to make up the number. It was random clicking to redress the balance
Is it really so hard to understand? You got banned for cheating - it's really that simple. Dooyoo isn't rocket science - the principles are easy. Write good well thought out reviews (they don't need to be 3000 words that took you two weeks to put together - just not 100 words of rubbish) and read lots of other people's work - but read it, don't just open it and rate without looking. How hard is that? | |
|
| |
spoilt_little_brat
Number of posts : 1427 Age : 38 Location : Conisbrough nr Doncaster Registration date : 2006-02-28
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Tue 19 Dec 2006, 20:25 | |
| lol 'Go Koshkha!!!' you tell him!! | |
|
| |
Thingywhatsit Admin
Number of posts : 5842 Age : 72 Registration date : 2006-02-12
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Tue 19 Dec 2006, 20:29 | |
| I think he has probably got the message by now. | |
|
| |
Stunt_101
Number of posts : 493 Location : The middle of nowhere Registration date : 2006-11-07
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Tue 19 Dec 2006, 21:05 | |
| Lol, that was a clear message | |
|
| |
berlioz
Number of posts : 3532 Age : 42 Location : Neo-Tampere 3 (Hervanta that is) Registration date : 2006-03-01
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Tue 19 Dec 2006, 22:46 | |
| Wonder if he's actually even bothering to come here anymore. | |
|
| |
Stunt_101
Number of posts : 493 Location : The middle of nowhere Registration date : 2006-11-07
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Tue 19 Dec 2006, 22:51 | |
| Who is this guy anyway? | |
|
| |
sam1942
Number of posts : 77 Age : 52 Location : Somewhere in Time Registration date : 2006-04-13
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned Wed 20 Dec 2006, 17:26 | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Why I was banned | |
| |
|
| |
| Why I was banned | |
|