Hello everybody,
I am responsible for the geographical structure @trivago, including adding missing destinations. I was very surprised to find this thread here as the whole geographical structure is very complicated and difficult to understand
and Alan never asked me to explain the process......and now unfortunately, there are some mistakes that I wish to correct. Here we go:
- Newfloridian wrote:
- Remember that countries are split into regions and these regions then have a list of destinations within them. They are NOT attractions or hotels. They are not subregions (counties) either.
Not quite correct. Every country is split into regions. Most countries have subregions as well. An island can be a subregion. Or have a look at France: The départements are the regions, but you also have subregions like the French Riviera or Brittany.
Subregions can of course also be requested through the DB-maintenance-tool.
- Newfloridian wrote:
-
It is now useful to obtain some supportive evidence for your submission. Type the town name into a web search engine and make a note of the web address relating to the town.
Yup, very good, but it's also good to point out the touristic relevance of the missing city/region: Why should it be added to the database? It makes no sense to have cities/regions added just because they are missing, if no content will be added in that new city/region.
- Newfloridian wrote:
-
Submissions are checked by a high level member and it can take a long time before your submission appears in the database.
Long time = 1 week maximum. The site is updated once per week and newly added cities/regions only appear on the website after such update. If you are lucky, the update is run the night after your request has been comfirmed and you only have to wait 1 day, but it can also be that you have to wait 7 days
Due to these updates, I do not confirm missing cities on a daily basis, but usually once or twice per week.
(It took a little longer in the past due to technical probs and also lack of time, for which I apologize, but all requests from trivago.co.uk-users have been confirmed and will be confirmed on a more regular basis in the future).
- Newfloridian wrote:
-
The award is always 100%.
No, it's not
Rejections are usually not rewarded
and confirmations can be rewarded with less than 100% if no source is given (unless it is a newbie requesting something for the 1st time) etc. The award is usually 100%, but definitely not always.
- Newfloridian wrote:
-
The recommendation is to add the attraction to the town nearest to the "Missing City" - in this case York - as a temporary measure. (See ADD ITEM thread) We have the opportunity of making a database correction and moving Eden Camp to its proper place once Malton appears in the list.
Holy ****, who recommended this?
No, please don't do that.
The recommendation is clearly to
1. request the missing city
2. wait for the request to be confirmed
3. wait for the city to appear on the website
4. add the attraction(or any other content) to the newly added city.
If you do it the way that you describe, you generate more work (moving the attraction to the new city later on) and also more shares, which can and should be avoided.
Any more questions? Feel free to pop into my guestbook
@trivago, as I do not read here regularly.
Cheers, Tatjana