January Diamonds are out - let the debate begin (AGAIN!)

helencbradshaw wrote:

steerpyke wrote:

Can I also add, I have long hair and a copy of the New Testament, that dosnt make me Jesus. I'm just making it worse for myself aren't I?

Well no...obviously Jesus wouldn't have had a New Testament...AD and all that...

depends on when you believe the NT texts were written. I follow the Essene Temple/ Barbara Thierring theory of the texts being the new book of a new jewish church movement that just happened to turn into Chrisianity with the development of Pauline Doctrine. But hey, it was just meant to be a joke. (lol)

right can we get back to the blasphemy and political incorrectness.

koshkha wrote:

? Or a condom? still anonymous and enigmatic, maybe not so dignified.

DICKHEAD

back on track......

Helen's right - it's a lottery of sorts.

Ciao's Favourite Member wrote:

Helen's right - it's a lottery of sorts.

slim chance of winning then!

Well, in theory, the more you write, the better chance you have of winning, innit?

Something else to increase your chances would be to sacrifice their beliefs in what makes a good review (assuming, as I do, that the current template for diamonds isn't particularly helpful)and write within the categories that tends to get a lot of diamonds.

that just seems to be taking it all too seriously for my liking. As we all know, write here for the joy of writing and social interactions, if its money or prestige (diamonds) you want then you need to be working for the Times.

That's true, but there are people out there that do put a lot of faith into the rewards regarding quality that these sites tend to offer.

You only have to see the lengths some people will go to for VHs and the grief bestowed upon those that rate lower to realise that people will do strange things for a tenner and a little picture.

LOL I'm a loser then

Well, I'd hate to disagree.